Oh my goodness! Unless you are a Tree of Life developer, you really shouldn't be here. This page is part of our beta test site, where we develop new features for the ToL, often messing up a thing or two in the process. Please visit the official version of this page, which is available here.

Morphological Synapomorphies of Chiroptera

Nancy B. Simmons and Tenley Conway

Chiroptera have many unique characteristics, including the following morphological synapomorphies:

1. Deciduous dentition does not resemble adult dentition; deciduous teeth with long, sharp, recurved cusps (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Close-up views of the deciduous dentition of

(A) Pteropus gouldi
(Megachiroptera, Pteropodidae)

(B) Eonycteris spelaea
(Megachiroptera, Pteropodidae)

(C) Lasiurus cinereus
(Microchiroptera, Vespertilionidae)

(D) Tadarida mexicana
(Microchiroptera, Molossidae)

(E) Thyroptera discifera
(Microchiroptera, Thyropteridae)

(F) Carollia perspicillata
(Microchiroptera, Phyllostomidae)

2. Palatal process of premaxilla reduced; left and right incisive foramina fused in midsagital plane.

3. Postpalatine torus absent

4. Jugal reduced and jugolacrimal contact lost

5. Two entotympanic elements in the floor of the middle-ear cavity: a large caudal element and a small rostral element associated with the internal carotid artery.

6. Tegmen tympani tapers to an elongate process that projects into the middle-ear cavity medial to the epitympanic recess.

7. Proximal stapedial artery enters cranial cavity medial to the tegman tympani; ramus inferior passes anteriorly dorsal to the tegmen tympani.

8. Enlarged fenestra rotundum.

9. Vomeronasal epithelial tube absent.

10. Accessory olfactory bulb absent.

11. Posterior laminae present on ribs.

12. Modification of scapula: reorientation of scapular spine and modification of shape of scapular fossae; reduction in of height of spine; presence of a well-developed transverse scapular ligament; presence of at least two facets in infraspinous fossa. (Figures 2 and 3).

Figure 2. Axillary view (right) and glenoid fossa view (left) of scapula of (A) Tupia glis (Scandentia), (B) Lepilemur mustelinus (Primates), (C) Cynocephalus sp. (Dermoptera), (D) Dobsonia crenulatum (Megachiroptera), and (E) Vampyrum spectrum (Microchiroptera).
Figure 3. Dorsal view of the right scapula (A) Tupia glis (Scandentia), (B) Lepilemur mustelinus (Primates), (C) Cynocephalus sp. (Dermoptera), (D) Dobsonia crenulatum (Megachiroptera), and (E) Vampyrum spectrum (Microchiroptera).

13. Modification of elbow; reduction of olecranon process and humeral articular surface on ulna; presence of ulnar patella; absence of olecranon fossa on humerus.

14. Absence of supinator ridge on humerus.

15. Occipitopollicalis muscle and cephalic vein present in leading edge of propatagium.

16. Digits II-V of forelimb elongated with complex carometacarpal and intermetacarpal joints, support enlarged interdigital flight membranes (patagia); digits III-V lack claws.

17. Modification of hip joint; 90 degree rotation of hindlimbs effected by reorientation of acetabulum and shaft of femur; neck of femur reduced; ischium tilted dorsolaterally; anterior pubes widely flared and pubic spine present; absence of m. obturator internus. (Figures 4 and 5).

Figure 4. Posterior view of right half of the pelvis and articulated femur of (A) Rousettus amplexicaudatus (Megachiroptera), (B) Eumops perotis (Microchiroptera), and (C) Tupaia glis (Scandentia). Figure 5. Lateral view of the right side of the pelvis of (A) Dobsonia crenulata (Megachiroptera), and (B) Vampyrum spectrum (Microchiroptera).

18. Sacrum terminates posterior to midpoint of acetabelum.

19. Absence of m. gluteus minimus.

20. Absence of m. sartorius.

21. Vastus muscle complex not differentiated.

22. Modification of ankle joint: reorientation of upper ankle joint facets on calcaneum and astragalus; trochlea of astragalus convex, lacks medial and lateral guiding ridges; tuber of calcaneum projects in plantolateral direction away from ankle and foot; peroneal process absent; sustentacular process of calcaneum reduced, calcaneoastragalar and sustentacular facets on calcaneum and astragulus coalesced; absence of groove on astragalus for tendon of m. flexor digitorum fibularis.

23. Entocuneiform proximodistally shortened, with flat triangular distal facet.

24. Elongation of proximal phalanx of digit I of foot. (Figure 6)

Figure 6. Dorsal view of the foot of (A) Rousettus amplexicaudatus (Megachiroptera), and (B) Phyllostomus hastatus (Microchiroptera).

25. Embryonic disc orientation toward tubo-unterine junction at time of implantation.

26. Differentiation of a free, glandlike yolk sac (Figure 7).

27. Preplacenta and early chorioallantoic plancenta diffuse or horseshoe shaped, with definitive placenta reduced to a more localized discoidal structure (Figure 7).

28. Definitive chorioallantoic placental endotheliochorial. (Figure 7).

Figure 7. Stages in fetal membrane development in (A,B,C) Pteropus sp. (Megachiroptera), and (D,E,F) Molossus ater (Microchiroptera). A = allantois; CAP = definitive chorioallantoic placenta; GYS = glandular yolk sac; PP = preplacenta; YS = yolk sac.

29. Baculum present.

30. Left central lobe of liver separate from other lobes or partially fused with right central lobe.

31. Caecum absent.

32. Cortical somatosensory representation of forelimb reverse of that in other mammals. (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Cortical representation of the body surface as determined from somatosensory mapping experiments. A. Body surface map of Macroderma gigas. B. Location of body surface map in brain of Macroderma gigas. C. Schematic representation of the body surface of Macroderma gigas. D. Schematic representation of the body surface of Pteropus poliocephalus (Megachrioptera). E. Schematic represenation of the body surface of a laboratory rat. All figures redrawn from Wise at al. (1986).

For a detailed discussion of these characteristics see References.


Simmons, N .B. 1994. The case for chiroptera monophyly. American Museum Novitates, 3103 :1-54.

Simmons, N. B. 1988. A reappraisal of interfamilial relationships of bats. In Bats: Phylogeny, Morphology, Echolocation and Conservation Biology. T. H. Kunz and P. A. Racey (eds.). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Simmons, N. B. & J. H. Geisler. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Icaronycteris, Archeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx to extant bat lineages, with comments in microchiroptera. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 235:1-182.

Wise, L. Z., J. D. Pettigrew, & M. B. Calford. 1986. Somatosensory cortical in the Australian ghost bat, Macroderma gigas. J. Comp. Neurology, 248:257-262.

About This Page

Nancy B. Simmons
American Musuem of Natural History, New York, New York, USA

Tenley Conway
University of Toronto at Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Page: Tree of Life Morphological Synapomorphies of Chiroptera Authored by Nancy B. Simmons and Tenley Conway. The TEXT of this page is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License - Version 3.0. Note that images and other media featured on this page are each governed by their own license, and they may or may not be available for reuse. Click on an image or a media link to access the media data window, which provides the relevant licensing information. For the general terms and conditions of ToL material reuse and redistribution, please see the Tree of Life Copyright Policies.

close box

This page is a note that is attached to a branch of the Tree of Life.

ToL notes provide brief accounts of characteristics, short summaries, commentaries, media files, taxonomic information, or identification tools for a given group of organisms.

For a more detailed explanation of the different ToL page types, have a look at the Structure of the Tree of Life page.

close box


Page Content

articles & notes




Explore Other Groups

random page

  go to the Tree of Life home page