Oh my goodness! Unless you are a Tree of Life developer, you really shouldn't be here. This page is part of our beta test site, where we develop new features for the ToL, often messing up a thing or two in the process. Please visit the official version of this page, which is available here.
Under Construction

Microhylidae

Narrow-Mouthed Frogs

David Cannatella
Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window
Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window
 Kaloula pulchra
From Ford and Cannatella (1993) and Frost (1985).
Containing group: Neobatrachia

Introduction

Microhylids are called Narrow-Mouthed Frogs, althought not all of the species have the very narrow mouths and pointed heads seen in the New World species. This family has the largest number of genera, with more than 60. They are found principally in tropical regions of the world: South America, Africa, Madagascar, SE Asia, Indonesia, New Guinea, Australia (NE only). They also are found in the more temperate regions of North America and Africa. The two genera in the United States are Gastrophryne and Hypopachus.

In size they range from tiny forms (10 mm) to moderately large animals (100 mm). In many the body form is tear-drop-shaped, with a narrow, pointed snout and rather rounded body. However, some are more treefrog like, with expanded digital tips, such as Kaloula.

Breviceps, the Rain Frogs of Africa, have a very short face; during amplexus the male becomes attached to the female by sticky skin secretions. Many microhylids are burrowers, emerging only after heavy rains. Most are dull, but are few such as Dyscophus may be brightly colored. As a group they tend to be ant and termite-specialists. Some exhibit a commensal relationship with burrowing spiders (Crocroft and Hambler, 1989). Phrynomerus, the Rubber Frogs, have intercalary elements in the digits and have often been placed in a separate family Phrynomeridae.

The most informative reference remains (Parker, 1934).

Discussion of Phylogenetic Relationships

One persistent issue of the taxonomy of Microhylidae has been the inclusion of scaphiophrynines (Scaphiophryne and Pseudohemisus); the group has been alternatively included in Ranidae or Microhylidae (see review in Wassersug, 1984). The ambiguity was based on the description of tadpoles of two Malagasy species by Angel (1931), which were referred to Pseudohemisus verrucosus and P. longimanus; these tadpoles had beaks and denticles. However, these larvae were shown to belong to ranid species (Blommers-Schlösser, personal communication in Wassersug [1984]). Otherwise, the monophyly of Microhylidae has not been questioned.

The Type 2 larva of Orton (1953, 1957) was generally considered diagnostic of Microhylidae, but larvae of scaphiophrynines, as for many microhylids, remained unknown. However, the description of the tadpole of Pseudohemisus granulosum (Blommers-Schlösser, 1975; Wassersug, 1984, 1989) provided an intermediate suite of characters between the Type 2 and Type 4 tadpoles, and drew attention to the inadequacy of Orton's tadpole groups. Duellman and Trueb (1986) continued to use the Type 2 larva (their character O2) as a synapomorphy of Microhylidae, and discussed the intermediate morphological status of the scaphiophrynine tadpole. The concern over the definition of the Type 2 tadpole has diverted attention from the more important issue, that of relationships. In fact, analysis of the characters of the Pseudohemisus tadpole (Wassersug, 1984) provides simultaneously a suite of derived features uniting scaphiophrynines with the other microhylids, and a suite of derived features allying those microhylids (here called Scoptanura) to the exclusion of scaphiophrynines (as represented by Pseudohemisus.)

Ford and Cannatella (1993) defined Scoptanura to be the most recent common ancestor of dyscophines, cophylines, brevicipitines, asterophryines, genyophryines, melanobatrachines, Phrynomerus, and microhylines, as listed in Duellman and Trueb (1986), and all its descendants. Scoptanura was used by Starrett (1968, 1973) as a name for the group associated with the Type 2 tadpole. This name is used because it minimizes the creation of new names, not to encourage the use of Orton's tadpole groups. The name Scoptanura occupies a hierarchical position between the (family) Microhylidae and the included groups (subfamilies), but it has no rank. Therefore, it is not necessary to modify the endings of names such as Cophylinae, etc. Microhylidae was defined to be the most recent common ancestor of scaphiophrynines and Scoptanura, and all its descendants; this is the currently used concept of the name. Scaphiophryninae* is a metataxon.

Synapomorphies of Microhylidae include the following larval features: absence of cornified denticles, ventral velum divided medially, glottis fully exposed on buccal floor, nares not perforated, secretory ridges of branchial food traps with only a single row of secretory cell apices (Wassersug, 1984), and two or three palatal folds in adults (Parker, 1934).

Synapomorphies of Scoptanura include these larval characters: median spiracle, gill filaments poorly developed or absent, modifications of buccal pumping mechanism (short lever arm on ceratohyal, small buccal floor area), absence of the suspensoriohyoideus muscle, and the lack of separation of the quadrato-, hyo-, and suspensorioangularis muscles.

Addtional Photographs

Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window
Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window

Gastrophryne olivacea, Texas; photo © 1995 David Cannatella

Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window
Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window

Pseudohemisus pustulosa; photo © 1995 David Cannatella

Other Names for Microhylidae

References

Click here for general list of references

Title Illustrations
Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window
Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window

1. Scaphiophryne cf. marmorata; photo © 1995 David Cannatella
2. Kaloula pulchra, Thailand; photo © 1995 David Cannatella

Copyright © 1995 David Cannatella
Kaloula pulchra
Copyright © 1995 David Cannatella
About This Page
If you are interested in authoring or co-authoring the page for this taxon, or some part of it (even a species), contact David Cannatella.

David Cannatella
University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA

Correspondence regarding this page should be directed to David Cannatella at

Page: Tree of Life Microhylidae. Narrow-Mouthed Frogs. Authored by David Cannatella. The TEXT of this page is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License - Version 3.0. Note that images and other media featured on this page are each governed by their own license, and they may or may not be available for reuse. Click on an image or a media link to access the media data window, which provides the relevant licensing information. For the general terms and conditions of ToL material reuse and redistribution, please see the Tree of Life Copyright Policies.

Citing this page:

Cannatella, David. 1995. Microhylidae. Narrow-Mouthed Frogs. Version 01 January 1995 (under construction). http://tolweb.org/Microhylidae/16954/1995.01.01 in The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/

edit this page
close box

This page is a Tree of Life Branch Page.

Each ToL branch page provides a synopsis of the characteristics of a group of organisms representing a branch of the Tree of Life. The major distinction between a branch and a leaf of the Tree of Life is that each branch can be further subdivided into descendent branches, that is, subgroups representing distinct genetic lineages.

For a more detailed explanation of the different ToL page types, have a look at the Structure of the Tree of Life page.

close box

Microhylidae

Page Content

articles & notes

collections

people

Explore Other Groups

random page

  go to the Tree of Life home page
top